Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament
Bil Senedd Cymru (Rhestrau Ymgeiswyr Etholiadol)| Senedd Cymru (Electoral Candidate Lists) Bill
Ymateb gan Unigolyn | Evidence from Individual
I agree with the policy objective of aiming to enusre the Senedd is broadly representative of the gender make-up of the population. This is a laudable aim.
I have concerns that forcing a gender split may mean that some good quality candidates will not be selected. As you are making parties publish a candidate list then this should be based on merit alone. If we wish to have the Senedd full of the best people then this is the only way. If the concern is that parties may favour "the old boys club" then they should also publish the reasons why candidates were selected in the order they were.
If you are forcing a male/female split then you need to enforce it
You may not get the best candidates elected. Selection should be on merit. It may also put some good candidates off standing as they might believe that they will not get on ballot due to gender quotas.
Just because each party is gender split does not mean that those elected will be gender equal as will depend on votes. It could be that each party standing candidates in a seat will have say a male on top of the list and the way the vote share goes each party may get 1 seat = all men. So on that basis this policy may not work anyway
If you are not selecting on merit the quality of politicians may go down eroding voter trust
I think that if a outstanding candidate was not selected due to quotas they would potentially have a claim of discrimination